Showing posts with label minimalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label minimalism. Show all posts

Friday, January 2, 2026

Artist's Talk, Dennos Museum, 2025

“Bryn Mawr,” the title of this book, is a Welsh phrase that literally translates to “Big Hill.”  Picture Andrew Wyeth’s classic painting, “Christina’s World,” with the woman sitting in the field and the big house in the distance, on top of that hill… “Bryn Mawr.”


"Christina's World," Andrew Wyeth, 1948

A visiting artist saw the paintings that make the pages of this book in the early ‘90’s. She said that they reminded her of “Bryn Mawr.” It was a reference to the Brandywine School of painting, typified by Wyeth. 

This was a surprise because such imagery was the furthest thing from my mind. The level of detail associated with Andrew Wyeth’s paintings was absent from this artwork.  

"Pa-rurw," 30" x 22", acrylic on paper, 1993

Two distinctly different bodies of work meet in “Bryn Mawr.”  A newer aesthetic overlays paintings from nearly 35 years ago.  As such, not only are they from different times, but they have different motivations, and personal histories.

To put the earlier body of work into context:  I was only sporadically making artwork for about 8 years from the mid 80’s to the early 90’s.  Life was happening; my career as a cabinet maker had begun immediately upon graduating from art school in 1984.  

It was a good vocation, and necessary to make a living. 

While the field started out deeply engaging, over the decades it became a grind.  It was hard work, on your feet all day, and the hours and energy it required stunted what I saw as my studio life. 

Certainly, it’s an artistic field in its own right; but cabinet making is a craft marked by repetition and tedium, as well as regular overtime.  The attention to detail required is anything but expressive.  It is a terribly fussy business to produce other people’s designs.  Your work conforms to blueprints and architects, as well as home owners who are paying a lot for custom furnishings.  

When I did get into the studio, it was to blow off steam; slamming away at very messy, highly textural stuff.  

Thrashing.

But I’ve gotten ahead of myself.
 

Back then, in the mid-80’s, I met and married an artist who was also a graduate of my school, the Corcoran College of Art & Design in Washington, DC.  These were difficult years because neither of us wanted to be burdened with our jobs, each of us having serious studio-artist aspirations.  Eventually, we would leave Washington, DC, and move down to the Atlantic coast, to the idyllic eastern shore of Maryland. 

Unfortunately, within 6 weeks of that move, my wife discovered a lump on her breast, and three years later lost her life to that cancer. 

I was the primary caretaker for those years, and as you might imagine, I made no artwork during this time.

Then one night, about a month after her passing, I was sitting on the sofa watching “Roseanne.”  I said to myself that if I were an artist I would be up in that studio, in my wife’s space, making art.  I turned off that TV and went upstairs to begin a body of work that would continue for 20 years.  The pages of "Bryn Mawr" are from the first years of that series.

After some time, a series of drawings had emerged:  renderings of isolated cubes set in an abstract landscape.  (There was a box-making endeavor happening in my own shop at the time.)  These landscape backgrounds became so compelling that I stopped using the cubes entirely.  The images were reduced to a simple horizon line with different textural fields above and below, as you see in this book.


"The Wilderness of Paran," acrylic on paper, 30" x 22", 1993

 But what does one do with a body of artwork?  The classic artist’s conundrum.  These paintings were never shown.  They were easy enough to store and transport though, being works on paper.

Binding them into a book would make them even more convenient for storage and transportation. However, I don’t see myself as a book artist.  This idea was a matter of convenience and book making is its own art form.

Books imply a narrative, a story.  They start somewhere and then end up somewhere else. This was an issue.  They didn’t go anywhere.  This was just old work and it needed to be more.


"A Promise of Canaan," acrylic on paper, 30" x 22", 1993

Since that original body of artwork nearly 35 years ago, the aesthetic had pivoted from an expressionistic abstract type to a geometric body of work.  I had retired from being a cabinetmaker in the wake of the real estate bubble burst in 2008. 

It took some time to realize it, years in fact, but there was no longer any reason to thrash away in the studio—there was no steam to blow off steam because my frustrating daily grind was over.  A bit of an existential crisis…

We had moved to upstate New York, and took a day trip to visit the Dia: Beacon Foundation.  It was a museum of classic Minimal art, housed in a renovated factory that once produced boxes for the Nabisco Company.  The artwork was impactful:  collections of John Chamberlain’s crushed automobile sculptures, Michael Heizer’s enormous boulders mounted into walls, and Richard Sierra’s huge curved steel walls were heavy hitters.

One morning in the wake of that visit, as I was making the bed I had a conversation in my head with a struggling artist.  I told them that if I were them, I’d get some paper and start making drawings of squares.

Realizing that I was talking to myself, literally, I finished making the bed as quickly as possible, ran to the store and bought a pack of computer paper and sat down to draw those squares.


Ideation Drawing, 11" x 8.5", 2011

To my utter surprise, I found myself longing for the technical demands of custom woodworking!  A lot of skill and discipline had been instilled during 25 years in the field.  I immersed myself in drafting exercises, working through ideations of squares, circles, and the like. 

Now, over 15 years later, this geometric language has transformed considerably through many iterations, resulting in the hexagonal designs on these pages of “Bryn Mawr.”

Rhombus/Hexagon Connections, 2023

This change in aesthetic was an accurate reflection of my life situation, just as the bleak landscapes represented my condition in the wake of my first wife's death.

I was able to retire from work in 2011, because of my current wife’s success in her career in higher education.  Thirty years ago, when we met on a blind date, she was a college professor.  Over time Deb became involved in administration, eventually ascending to the rank of college president!  In 2021 she was also able to retire and is a full-time quilter.

It’s because of her love, success, and indulgence that I’m able to be a full-time studio artist. Thank you, Deb.

This is how the book comes to be.  It is a depiction of the effects of love on a desolate life.  The big hill book, “Bryn Mawr,” is about elevating a former life and allowing the past to be passed.  What is passed provides a background upon which a beautiful, pristine design is presented, rather than being the whole picture.

“Bryn Mawr” is a love story; it’s about the change that love makes.  These few pages reveal a before-and-after combination of completely different styles and techniques that tells a wonderful story.  A story I didn’t even realize until sitting down to write about it.

And they lived happily ever after :)

https://jtnwdc.wixsite.com/jamesthatcherarts

Sunday, December 3, 2017

Portfolio Spread


Construction Study, 2014, 96", Latex Paint on Pine

"Hypar w/2 Equations", 2015, 14" x 7", Acrylic on Canvas

"Blue Braid 1/30", 2016, 16" x 8", Acrylic on Drywall Tape

Study based on Norwegian Architect, Soren Korsgaard, 48", Pine

"Curabola Layout Study", 2017, 24" x 24", Acrylic on Canvas

"Curabola", 2017, 24", Pine

Hyperbolic Paraboloid,18", 2017, Welded Steel w/Powder Coat Finish

"Oblique Tetrahedron", 2017, 36", Welded Steel w/Powder Coat Finish

"Red Bodice", 2017, 48" x 36" (2 panels), Acrylic on Canvas

All artworks © James Thatcher


Monday, November 14, 2016

Cut, Paste, and Scale


Not being able to visualize an art project motivates me as an artist.

I was mulling over different ways to render the hyperbolic paraboloid after creating 30-8” models in bamboo last winter. 

An early version, bamboo, 12"

Hyperbolic Paraboloid in a Cube, bamboo & acrylic paint, 8"


4 Hyperbolic Paraboloids in combination 

I liked the idea of building the artwork rather than simply continuing to render it by drawing or painting the image.  I settled on using drywall tape to create a piece.  It costs about a penny a foot and it won’t wrinkle when painted.  How would it weave together to build that torqued grid of the hyperbolic paraboloid?  

"Hyperbolic Paraboloid with Equations", acrylic on canvas, 14" x 7"  ©  James Thatcher  2016

It didn’t!  
It became a surprise braid instead. 

Drywall tape sketch, 48" x 24"

Here’s a brief time lapse video of an early take on the project.  Notice the shaped canvas in the background.  Ideas to extend the original concept are already underway. 


The braid image has some issues as a focus project because it’s simply too big at 48” across.  What size makes sense?  How would you present it?  Mounted on a plywood panel?  Pinned to the wall?  As shaped canvas paintings? 

Exploring the range of sizes from ¾ scale to 1/8 scale offered many possibilities but presentation was still an issue.  The 1/3 scale seems best as it yields a finished piece of 16” x 8” which can be effective as an individual unit.  Combining pieces still maintains a manageable size.

Scale comparison, full size to 1/3 scale
I can mount these to sheets of paper or float them in simple metal frames.  I could laminate them and suspend them because both sides are different.  

Front side of braid, gesso on drywall tape, 16" x 8"

Back side

4 braids in combination, gesso on drywall tape, 16" x 16"
Lots of Possibilities!

You know how caterers make spiraling stacks of napkins? It seemed like a simple presentation but that project held a surprise.  Here's a 30 second time lapse video of the effort (I really like the soundtrack):



http://jtnwdc.wixsite.com/jamesthatcherarts






Sunday, January 3, 2016

Incidental Discoveries are Crucial

An artist does an awful lot of artwork in a lifetime.  Ideas overtake our imaginations and we rush on generating ideas, sketches, artwork and proposals. 

Ideation Drawing:  Hexagon Variations  ©  James Thatcher  2012

Use a “focus project” to concentrate on a single successful image from those labors.  Produce 30 identical versions with no variation in size, process or subject matter. This will stabilize studio output and concentrate your art making processes and effort.  

And it will generate a market of strong reliable imagery. 

I’m in the midst of the second focus project in the past twelve months. The first focus project was 30 small paintings, 8” x 10” each.

Transformation Hexagon  © James Thatcher  2015
© James Thatcher  2015



















This second effort is sculptural and the discoveries are compelling. 

In a 2-D focus project you only have finished work at the end of the process.  Suddenly you’ve got 30 finished pieces.  The joy and beauty of this 3-D focus project pops up in unexpected places as assembled sections need to be stored.  
 Proposal for Public Sculpture ©  James Thatcher  2015

These incidental discoveries are crucial.  They maintain creative interest during the long weeks and months of production. You don’t want to break the momentum of your epic focus project but these ideas can also be works in themselves.

18 Corner Pieces, Bamboo  ©  James Thatcher  2015
So be sure to photograph and make note of your ideas.  Also consider making drawings and paintings of these various stages after completing the main body of work.  They represent a strong direction for future artworks and possibly your career.


Creating 2-D artworks extends the depth of your 3-D portfolio.  It’s a separate/additional body of work that supports your sculpture installation.  They provide a wall mounted display to accompany your floor display in a pre-curated collection.    


Model for Sculpture/Painting Installation  ©  James Thatcher  2016
(What if this were a giant outdoor steel sculpture with a digital billboard behind it?)
The question of whether one is a sculptor or a painter is not relevant because the relationship between your 3-D and 2-D images is so clear.  You present the artwork of one artist who uses multiple mediums to explore their ideas.  

Brilliant!

The dedication displayed by presenting your ideas in a volume of related artworks is impressive.  Your vision is clearly defined and explored at a depth displayed only by the most professional of artists.  

(Welcome to the big time) 




Sunday, February 1, 2015

Focus Project

I’m making thirty identical paintings.  They're each 8” x 10” and modeled after a study of a blue gradient Tree of Life hexagon.  

"Transformation Hexagon"  ©  2015
This image's step-by-step process make it a natural choice for this sort of project.  Focusing on the same shape, same colors, same process, technique and size will yield the same result X 30.


This is the most controversial assignment given by our faculty at the Corcoran College of Art + Design (Washington, DC, 1980’s). However, it was given after 2 months of free range creativity. Nobody mentioned it, but the piles of artwork generated during that first stage were about discovering our modus operandi and ONE image.  

A piece that summed up the range of our unfettered production; our free association, lateral thinking, uninhibited choices in art making that sidestepped our fault-finding, self-filtering, uptight, judgmental fearful selves.

Duplicating that one piece thirty times through the Focus Project was an exercise in discipline and an example of what to do when you found that idea worth pursuing.

Sometimes logistics becomes sculpture.
We do an awful lot of artwork in a lifetime.  We produce drawings and sketches, and ideas that take over our imaginations.  We rush on to generate more ideas, sketches, and proposals…. 


And then what--continue the search for “the next big thing”?  Ugh….

Let’s stay with that brilliant, reduced idea.  Why discard it in the search for another?  They're worth holding onto.  When you find it, focus.  

A focus project brings a meditation on an image, finding out all that it holds and in the process of re-iteration controlled progress reveals itself.  

Side work produced during the current Focus Project.
Thinking becomes ordered, step-by-step instead of random.  Your body of work becomes cohesive and its coherence is evident.  Clarity becomes a trait of your artwork and process.  The directions you take become manageable choices that your clients and fan base follow as well.

Dare to impose a little discipline into the mix.  Hammer out thirty!  You might like it.  If nothing else, you’ll find a few that really sing!  You’ll internalize the image, as well as the focus processes and the multiples aesthetic.  You’ll have that ability and insight as a permanent part of your creative options.  

Who can argue with increasing one’s creative options?  

It’s an investment in yourself; in your discovery.  Your work merits the investigation.  This sort of output declares the importance of your own thinking, research and imagery.

And here’s a surprise:  I’m not making 30 paintings, I’m making one. 

                                                                                                        
 http://jtnwdc.wix.com/jamesthatcherarts                        

Monday, October 6, 2014

The Stillness Project



When I read the phrase, “Receive my Peace” in Susan Young’s daily devotional Jesus Calling I knew I had the bones of a nice inspirational image for the Facebook.

In the throes of my new grid based artworks, the idea had morphed into arrays of individual panels.  I’d just completed a couple dozen small white boxes.  Moving the piles around had gotten interesting as I began stacking them artfully.  I’d taken 62 photos as each box added to the stack made for a new arrangement.

There would be plenty to choose from to illustrate the “Receive My Peace” concept.






Surprisingly, this was not the case.  Looking with the guiding principle of “Peace” I found these images—every one of them—very busy.  

This was disturbing.  I thought that these little white boxes were undeniably quiet works.  No.


For a guy who uses “Out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks,” (Matthew 12:34) in his artist’s statement, I had some thinking to do.
Cube Drawing,  Graphite and Acrylic on Prepared Paper  1993  ©   James Thatcher


What was peace and how is it expressed?


Layout Template for "Discovering the Broken Obelisk" , Artist's Book, The Art Library, Brooklyn, NY
The concept of “stillness” came forward:  the square is a practical expression of equilibrium and balance because it is equal on all sides.  It can be an effective symbol of stillness.  

Surface quality was something to consider as well.  Is my signature heavy texture indicative of peace?  Not so much…

Then, in a conversation with a friend about “The Stillness Project” the idea of the color of peace came up.  What is the color of peace?  
Yves Klein regarding the color "Blue"     photo credit Harry Shunk

Perhaps it’s not one color but a range with peaceful application? 




This is the path I am choosing at the moment.  




Peace is alert with conscious choices occurring.  It isn’t sleep, right?  It’s a state of being.  Going back to the original idea, we are to “Receive His Peace”.  Being in the world, but not of the world; it is a gift from The Prince of Peace which we either accept or reject.  

Continually.




Saturday, August 30, 2014

A Moment in the Studio


Recently, I had a moment in the studio that made me stop everything! 
You know how you’ll have your agenda set, your process well directed, all systems GO—me too!  Letting the process take over has allowed paintings to emerge without preconceived notions.  Ah, to be so free….



But this time the picture jolted together before me and I was stunned.  Let me explain:
I’d killed my current painting a couple of times already.  I had a strong bed of texture laid down:  hay and cattails (bulrushes) embedded in a pool of dried latex paint.  Typically I use the lines from the textural underpainting to direct the subject matter, but it just wasn’t working out this time.

So I’d painted over the whole uptight mess—twice now.  I’d gotten a beautiful effect during paint-over #1 by applying a dark wash of watery paint over my texture.  I decided to do that again. 
All was going as according to plan.   The dark wash had gathered into all the pockets of that voluptuous surface and I was forging ahead with a new course of action.


"Sweetgrass Drawing  23/30", 8" x 10", Pastel and Gesso on Prepared Board
I decided that this time I would use the above drawing as a model for the painting.  My plan was to use my data projector to shoot the drawing onto the canvas and simply paint it in.  However I couldn’t get the distance in my studio to enlarge the drawing enough—C’MON MAN!

I couldn’t seem to get a break with this painting!  The next day I decided that I could use the grid formula to increase the scale of the drawing and transfer it to the painting.   A piece of cake, old school but imminently doable….

This decision proved to be the game changer.

I measured out a 12” array over the surface and drew the lines in with charcoal.  The panel was laid on saw horses and as I finished the grid I set it up to begin the transfer process.

GASP. 

I saw it in an instant—a nano-instant. 

The grid broke up this epic field of texture into bite sized portions.  It isolated sections so that they became a group of individual pieces rather than an incomprehensible whole.  The visually overwhelming (who knew?) had become manageable.
In a rush of realization I set down the charcoal and stepped away from the painting.  Oh my goodness, what have I done!?
It was actually interesting!  The different pieces compared so well to each other…my eye was bouncing from one section to the next, over and across—I had to sit down.  I’d been knocked from Abstract Expressionism into Minimalism in one aesthetic hammer blow.

 



















And I haven't gone back...

In just a few days I’ve completed 3 other highly textured grid paintings using different colored washes for the background.  I’ve filled in the squares with fabulous colors (say goodbye to the latex neutrals!).  











I’ve left sections empty on some paintings.  I’ve left a group of 4 large panels void of any further markings after gorgeous blue green washes.  I’ve built 18 small square surfaces for a grid installation painting which are now heaped with hay and bulrushes and drying in the barn.


The current studio view

And the struggle, the noodling and the exertion, effort and strain of composing the “brilliant and breathtaking” is gone.  I’d had the nagging feeling that this work with the hay  didn't need to go much further, but I just hadn't found the way yet. 
Now it’s full steam ahead.
If you have frustration or nagging feelings with your creations, Listen To That.  Where are they coming from?  What do they mean?  They were telling me that what I was doing wasn't what I needed; that  I was pushing past my own artwork.
Blow it out—figure it out—talk it out—work it out.  Be bold, be alert, and look for your moment.  Expect it.  Grab it.  Run with it!